Science Britannica, BBC Two, review

|| || || Leave a komentar

Catherine Gee reviews Professor Brian Cox's new BBC series, Science Britannica.



Having already presented major documentary series titled Wonders of the Solar System, Wonders of the Universe and Wonders of Life, it was hard to guess where there was left to go for Britain’s favourite TV scientist. And so we have something of a departure from Brian Cox’s usual type of programme. Rather than squashing a wealth of facts about life, the universe and everything into hourly chunks and trotting to as many locations as possible, Cox has downsized with Science Britannica (BBC Two). He travelled little further than London, Cambridge, Norwich and north Wales for the first episode of his three-part historical guide to Britain’s contributions to the development of science.

That said, it was no less atmospheric, as Cox ambled through the narrowing passage of the Old Bailey (formerly Newgate Prison), performed Victorian experiments in a darkened lecture theatre, and explored the disused buildings of the site where the initial work on the atom bomb took place.

This opening episode examined the darker sides to science and the public’s distrust of scientific advancement. We’re all aware of the fear of meddling too far, as captured in the fiction of Mary Shelley, and seen in real life when experiments with atoms led to the detonation of two nuclear bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. But the message that travelled through Cox’s programme was how even the scariest areas of science can lead to important and necessary advancement.

Meeting Eileen Doxford, a former technician who was part of the atom bomb project (unbeknown to her at the time), Cox asked her point of view of the work with the benefit of hindsight. “I felt dreadful when I thought about all the people that had been killed,” she said. “But if it helped to end the war, which was a dreadful thing, then yes I feel pleased that I made a very minute contribution.”

Heading into similarly murky waters, Cox gave consideration to animal testing, believed by most in the medical profession to be a necessary evil given how it has saved and improved so many human lives. And he took in the arrival of genetically modified crops and the vehement opposition to them by the general public – a reaction dubbed “silly” by plant geneticist Jonathan Jones, who firmly stated that these developments can actively help to protect our crops.

Hugh Jackman, Jake Gyllenhaal unguarded in 'Prisoners'

|| || || Leave a komentar

They spar and partner up to find two missing girls in the acclaimed thriller.



TORONTO – What is about to unfold, over steaming cups of tea on a recent Thursday evening, can only be described as an epic bromance between two very chiseled leading men.

"I hope this doesn't come across as too much of a fluff piece with two actors who really, really loved working with one another," Jake Gyllenhaal says with a sigh, a bit chagrined after spending an hour extolling the numerous virtues of Hugh Jackman.

The two geek out when they're together, their conversation ranging from stupid paparazzi encounters in Manhattan to the times they watched ESPN in Gyllenhaal's Prisoners trailer during filming. The two instantly bonded, and Jackman gives much of the credit to his wife, Deborra-Lee Furness.

"She has a lot of qualities of Jake, actually. When the two of them got together, Deb's like, 'I like him, he reminds me of me. He's awesome,'" announces Jackman, grinning wickedly. "What comes into their heads comes out. They are idealistic, big dreamers, quite romantic. Both have a wicked sense of humor, very naughty. Don't tell them what to do."

He turns to Gyllenhaal, who looks almost teary-eyed. "You'll tell me the (expletive) things about yourself, which most people want to hide about themselves, especially movie stars. Deb and I have been fans of Jake since October Sky — we've always thought that this kid is unbelievable."

Given the early reviews of Gyllenhaal and Jackman's intricate revenge thriller Prisoners, the critics tend to agree. The film, opening Friday, is a thoughtful, lengthy and twisty meditation on the price of vengeance. Jackman plays an all-American God-fearing carpenter who spins out of control when his daughter gets kidnapped. And as Gyllenhaal's tic-laden, insular cop investigates the disappearance, Jackman decides to solve the vexing and horrifying riddle on his own terms by imprisoning the weirdo (Paul Dano) he suspects of being responsible.

The film was transformative for both Gyllenhaal, 32. and Jackman, 44. For the former, it continued his recent commitment to working only on specific projects that speak to him, regardless of scope or size or paycheck. And for Jackman, who earned his first Academy Award nomination for last year's Les Miserables, it's a solid foray into darker, more intense and infinitely more emotionally nuanced work than his recent superhero stints as tormented Marvel Comics creature Wolverine.

Both actors approach their careers very differently. "I'm an actor who likes to prepare and sometimes my head can get in the way of me. I can over-think things," Jackman says.

Gyllenhaal, meanwhile, seems to have a more instinctual process. "The unconscious is a huge guide. You can listen to it in different ways. If you pay attention to certain instincts, it will lead you to a very interesting place. You have to find the people you gravitate towards," he says. "Hugh believed in me. He wanted me to play the role. He's a massive (expletive) movie star — sorry to swear — and he has the ability to choose anything, and he chose this. He was able to champion this material."

It's been a powerhouse 12 months for Jackman, something the affable Australian tends to play down; he's a genial, outgoing man who's loath to hype his own work. He admits that for Prisoners, he broke his own rule. "I read a couple of reviews. I normally don't read them. My publicist knows I don't read them. She just sent me an e-mail: 'You should read them.'"

He recalls just how surreal his first day on the Prisoners set was. "The first day of shooting, I'd just been nominated for my first Oscar. I was spinning about it. As I walked on set and I saw (cinematographer ) Roger Deakins, who had just gotten his 10th nomination. I walked up to him and said, 'Congratulations, Roger, between us, it's 11 nominations,'" says Jackman. In response, recalls a laughing Jackman, Deakins muttered that he wasn't even sure he was going.

As for Jackman, "You were wearing your tuxedo underneath your costume," jokes Gyllenhaal.

All kidding aside, for Gyllenhaal, the film explores a complex theme: "Where does forgiveness lie in ourselves and where does it lie in others? This subject matter has so much weight. It needs space. It makes it very hard to watch at times because you want to know the answer. To fathom for me, not being a parent — it's acting out of some sort of fantasy. You would hope someone would behave a certain way, maybe not in this way."

He played a cop before, in 2012's acclaimed End of Watch, and had already made one film with Prisoners director Denis Villeneuve, Enemy. At the time that Prisoners was coming together, Gyllenhaal was on stage in the Roundabout Theatre Company production of If There Is I Haven't Found It Yet. It proved fruitful.

"I was doing a play up until basically the week before we started shooting. When I was doing the show, I started playing the character on stage, which was weird to do," he says, as Jackman nods his approval. "I would just try something. I started testing things out. The first week, I didn't have the look totally down. I shot two very small scenes. I needed to be thinking while I was also observing. A sign I have found of highly intelligent people is that they have very interesting physical mannerisms, and I tried that. It was my job mostly to watch. That was a big aspect of it, to listen and to probe."

Of course, there's a flip side to playing a watchful, observant loner. "The character is hiding from his own thing. He's scared of his past. I wanted that in the scenes. But it sometimes took me away from my real life. I haven't worked since that. I'm about to start working again. It took a while to not look at everybody and question them. 'What's your truth?' Everyone is like, '(Expletive) off. Go deal with your truth,'" says Gyllenhaal.

The finished product is challenging to sit through, especially for a parent, because it's the manifestation of every mother and father's nightmare: children going missing while playing outdoors in a bucolic neighborhood. "My wife watching it was literally gripping my hand. As far as my character goes, my wife would go further. She would lay waste to an entire landscape. There's a lioness, that's my wife," says Jackman.

Though Gyllenhaal doesn't have kids, he spends ample time with his nieces Ramona and Gloria, the daughters of big sister Maggie. But Jackman is the dad of Oscar, 13, and Ava, 8 — he understands just how brutal the subject matter is.

"Even reading the script, I felt the pit in my stomach. The key was being specific. The more research I did about it, the more I felt that weight of responsibility. Every day in the papers this story is played out," he says.

Still, says Jackman, he didn't draw on his own fears as a dad to fuel the helpless, protective rage that's swelling inside his character. His family is too precious to him, as is his sanity.

"I think it's dangerous to constantly call on your own life as an actor. I try not to always use that as a trick. I've seen people play with that and it screws people up," says Jackman. "A movie like this is tough whether you're a dad or not. I certainly hug the kids a bit tighter. I certainly watch them a bit closer."

Jackman, who, like Gyllenhaal, lives in downtown Manhattan, will be heading back to Broadway as legendary stunt performer Harry Houdini; the script is currently being revised. And Gyllenhaal is on a severely restricted diet as he preps for the crime drama Nightcrawler, which he's also producing —Gyllenhaal is only half-joking when he says he's having raw kale for dinner. "I ate a lemon slice like that because I was so hungry," he recalls, making a sour face. "And I said, 'I love it!'"

The two get ready to wrap up the interview, but not before exchanging more sweet nothings. Jackman compliments Gyllenhaal on his commitment to character, and for being so honest about his own faults. Gyllenhaal, in turn, admires Jackman's complexion.

"Let me say this, because it annoys him — his skin is like a baby's (butt). How much more can you annoy someone?" jokes Gyllenhaal.

Jackman brushes off the compliment: "It's all makeup. Plus, you come to these junkets and you get eight hours of sleep. It's gold."

McAfee: Collins most 'dangerous' celeb search

|| || || Leave a komentar

'dangerous' celeb search



If you're curious about Lily Collins and head to the Internet to find out, beware _ McAfee has ranked the actress as the most dangerous celeb to search for online.

Collins_ who starred in movies such as "Mirror, Mirror" and "The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones" _ posed the biggest risk of landing on a malicious site, according the computer security company; last year Emma Watson topped the list.

Female celebrities were the overwhelming lure to malware; Avril Lavigne, Sandra Bullock, Kathy Griffin and Zoe Saldana rounded out the top five; "Mad Men" star Jon Hamm was the only man in the top 10.

A person could be led to malware after doing a general search and clicking on dubious links, but risks increased when searchers added phrases like "free apps" or "nude photos."

Review: Queen Latifah is clearing some space between Oprah and Ellen

|| || || Leave a komentar

It's important to remember that Oprah wasn't Oprah until, you know, she was an event that occurred only after years working as a host for a variety of shows.



I say this because Queen Latifah debuted her daytime talk show, "The Queen Latifah Show," Monday. Every new daytime host is rated on a scale of 1 to Oprah, but if you are a curvy black woman who is also an actress seeking to create "a safe space" in which people will feel comfortable enough to share things with you, well, that comparison has to be intense.

So perhaps Latifah will be forgiven for swinging more toward that other queen of daytime Ellen DeGeneres.

VIDEO: Fall 2013 TV trailers

Latifah showed up for her first day of work in a white suit with a black blouse, and yes, yes, it was obviously a testament to John Travolta, who was the show's first guest. But honestly, didn't she look just like Ellen?

And about that first guest. I'm as big a fan of Travolta's as the next middle-aged female viewer who learned how to dance to the Bee Gees, but when Latifah said she had chosen him because he "embodied" everything she hoped her show would be, I found myself at something of a loss. Certainly Travolta is a durable, even multi-talented performer, but no one could accuse him of generating anything like heat these days.

He falls more into the mildly beloved category, mainly because he seems to be such a genuinely nice guy, always ready to help out a friend. (He showed up on Kirstie Alley's short-lived reality series as well as her longer-lived "Fat Actress" and her upcoming sitcom "Kirstie.")

All of which may personify that safe space Latifah hopes to create. But as a way of promoting her show, well, watching stars smile and thank each other for being fabulous is not exactly riveting television. The smallest noise in the next room — a dust mite settling, a dog scratching fleas could — could, and did, prove a distraction.

PHOTOS: Celebrities by The Times

A pre-taped segment in which Latifah honored a local music teacher by taking him and his students to Sony Studios, introducing them to Alicia Keys, and giving their rehearsal room a much-needed makeover, was far more interesting if unabashedly emotionally manipulative. (Which is to say, yes, I cried a little.)

A life could be lived quite fully without ever seeing 12-year-old Willow Smith sing as she did toward the end of the hour (thereby giving my children one more reason to hate me for not being Will Smith, who by coincidence produces this show). But you know what? She was fine and apparently blowing up YouTube.

This is Latifah's second shot at a daytime talk show — the first, debuting in 1999, focused on the music world and lasted two years. This time, an "older and wiser" mood is definitely in play, and Latifah's career guarantees A-list guests including Smith, Jamie Foxx and Jake Gyllenhaal.

Still, it's hard to tell from the premiere precisely what Latifah is going for here, besides the truly fabulous set that was, apparently, designed by Lenny Kravitz.

Not surprisingly, the best bits revolved around her — a brief, amusing song spoof of "Stayin' Alive," a funnier series of her promoting her show via scenes from various Emmy contenders. (I wish Queen Latifah would show up in Don Draper's office and read him the riot act — seriously, how great would that be?)

BUZZMETER: Pundits make their Emmy picks

As previously noted, Oprah wasn't built in a day. Latifah could wind up with a new sort of hybrid of variety/talk show and that would be great. She too is talented, versatile and charismatic. Though she is always at her most attractive when she's back-talking (or singing) the sense into someone.

Nice may be the new snark, and who would argue with that trend? Unfortunately, nice isn't a new gig, "Ellen" has built an empire on it already.

But you can be fair-minded and good-hearted and retain some edge. At least you can if you're Queen Latifah and keep an open mind while figuring this whole talk show thing out.